Catching up from a couple of days off . . .
AFSCME leaders are lobbying GOP legislators
to override Rauner's looming veto of the mandatory arbitration bill. AFSCME negotiations determine the health benefits offered to all state
employees, including university faculty. The bill would require arbitration in the event the
two sides reach an impasse in bargaining. Rauner has said he believes AFSCME negotiations are at an impasse, and has asked the ILRB (Illinois Labor
Relations Board) to certify as much. AFSCME disagrees that negotiations are at an impasse, arguing that Rauner is simply refusing to negotiate (which doesn't constitute an impasse).
If a legal impasse is reached, the
employer has the right to impose their last contract offer--and the
union has the right to strike. But by and large an impasse benefits the employer. Hence "impasse to implementation" is a common employer strategy for getting their way in union negotiations. At least, unlike the Cheng
administration, Rauner isn't just declaring an impasse without a legal
ruling. Here at SIU, of course, the IELRB (Illinois Education LRB) eventually ruled that there was no impasse,
which resulted in everyone getting four days of pay back after the
illegal imposition of furloughs and imposed terms by the Cheng
administration. Thanks are due to members of the Cheng bargaining team for not only saying revealing things about the bargain to impasse strategy in meetings but recording them in minutes.
NTT faculty at U of I consider some sort of labor action. The new UIUC NTT union is having a difficult time in negotiations; they are trying to
win protections similar to those enjoyed by UIC NTT faculty, who are
guaranteed two-year appointments after five years and three-year
appointments after ten years. The UIUC plans for some sort of work
stoppage/labor action short of a full-on strike are no doubt dictated in
part by timing: the last couple of weeks of the semester are a poor
time to start a strike. You maximize damage to students (a bad thing) at
the end of the semester, and if you don't get things resolved at the
end of the semester you're left in limbo over the summer, with no
leverage and no pay (or at least no benefits, potentially, if you are on
a nine month contract). (UIUC tenure stream faculty are not unionized, though they have an active Campus Faculty Association.)
Residue of a blog led by SIUC faculty member Dave Johnson. Two eras of activity, the strike era of 2011 and a brief relapse into activity in 2016, during the Rauner budget crisis.
Saturday, April 9, 2016
2 comments:
I will review and post comments as quickly as I can. Comments that are substantive and not vicious will be posted promptly, including critical ones. "Substantive" here means that your comment needs to be more than a simple expression of approval or disapproval. "Vicious" refers to personal attacks, vile rhetoric, and anything else I end up deeming too nasty to post.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Point of information. Nobody has yet got back those four days of furlough deductions nor are they likely to at the present time.
ReplyDeleteWe got the money back about a year ago. My payment came on June 1, 2015.
ReplyDelete